1. Youden WJ, Steiner EH. Statistical Manual of AOAC. Washington DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1975. Google Scholar

2. Williams LR. Harmonization of biological testing methodology: a performance based approach in aquatic toxicology and hazard assessment. 8th Symp. ASTM STP 891, Bahner RC, Hansen DJ, eds. Philadelphia (PA): ASTM International, 1985. Google Scholar

3. Natrella MG. Experimental statistics. Washington DC: National Bureau of Standards Handbook 91, 1963. Google Scholar

4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidelines for establishing method equivalency to standard methods; Rep. 600/X-83-037. Las Vegas (NV): Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory; 1983. Google Scholar

5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Guidelines establishing test procedures for the analysis of pollutants under the Clean Water Act. Final rule. 1994. 40 CFR Part 136; Fed Reg. 59:20:4504. Google Scholar

Huber L. Validation of computerized analytical systems. Buffalo Grove (IL): Interpharm Press, Inc.; 1995. Google Scholar

Parkany M. Use of recovery factors in trace analysis. Cambridge (UK): Royal Society of Chemistry; 1996. Google Scholar

Huber L. Validation and qualification in analytical laboratories. Buffalo Grove (IL): Interpharm Press, Inc.; 1999. Google Scholar

Thompson M, Ellison SLR, Fajgelj A, Willetts P, Wood R. Harmonised guidelines for the use of recovery information in analytical measurement. Pure Appl Chem. 1999;71(2):337–348. Google Scholar

Aboul-Enein HY, Stefan R, Baiulescu G. Quality and reliability in analytical chemistry. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2000. Google Scholar

Fajgelj A, Ambrus A. Principles and practices of method validation. Cambridge (UK): Royal Society of Chemistry; 2000. Google Scholar

Huber L. A Primer: Good laboratory practice and current good manufacturing practice. Deutschland GmbH, Waldbronn (Germany): Agilent Technologies; 2000. Google Scholar

National Institute of Standards and Technology. The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty; 2002 [accessed 2020 June 15]. http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Uncertainty/index.html. Google Scholar

Thompson M, Ellison SLR, Wood R. Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem.2002;74(5):835–855. Google Scholar

Huber L. Validation of computerized analytical and networked systems. Denver (CO): Interpharm Press, Inc.; 2002. Google Scholar

Barrentine L. Concepts for R & R Studies, 2nd ed. Milwaukee (WI): ASQ Quality Press; 2003. Google Scholar

Cacuci DG. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis - Theory, Vol 1. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, 2003. Google Scholar

Egli H, Dassenakis M, Garelick H, van Grieken R, Peijnenburg WJGM, Klasinc L, Kördel W, Priest N, Tavares T. Minimum requirements for reporting analytical data for environmental samples. Pure Appl Chem. 2003;75(8):1097–1106. Google Scholar

1. Youden WJ, Steiner EH. Statistical Manual of the AOAC. Washington DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1975. Google Scholar