1. Having a Strong Quality Management System Prevents Faulty Data. Weatherford, Texas: The NELAC Institute; 2023. https://nelac-institute.org/docs/comm/advocacy/White%20Papers/WP-Reliable.pdf Google Scholar

2. Management and Technical Requirements for Laboratories Performing Environmental Analysis, Vol. 1. Weatherford, Texas: The NELAC Institute; 2016. Google Scholar

3. International Standards Organization; International Electrotechnical Commission. ISO/IEC 17025. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. Geneva, Switzerland: 2017. Google Scholar

4. Manual for the Certification of Laboratories Analyzing Drinking Water—Criteria and Procedures, Quality Assurance, 5th ed. EPA- 815-R05-004. Cincinnati (OH): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2005. Google Scholar

1. Method 8000 D. Determinative chromatographic separations. Revision 5, Hazardous waste test methods, SW-846. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2018. Google Scholar

2. Burrows R, Parr J. Evaluating the goodness of instrument calibration for chromatography procedures. LCGC Supplements. 2020;38(11):35–38. Google Scholar

3. Quality Systems for Chemical Testing, Volume 1, Module 4. Weatherford, Texas: The NELAC Institute; 2016. [available for purchase] https://www.nelac-institute.org/content/CSDP/standards.php?ap3/1_1 Google Scholar

4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2016. Changes to method detection limit (MDL) procedure, III.H. In: Clean Water Act Methods Update Rule for the analysis of effluent. 40 CFR 136. Google Scholar

5. Method 625.1: Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS. EPA-821-R-14-015. Washington DC: Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2014. Google Scholar

6. Technical Support Document for the Assessment of Detection and Quantitation Approaches. EPA-821-R-03-005. Washington DC: Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2003. Google Scholar