The content presented here represents the most current version of this section, which was printed in the 24th edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.

8711 DAPHNIA

CopyRight

8711 A. Introduction References
1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms, 5th ed. EPA-821-R-02-12. Washington DC: Office of Water; 2002. Google Scholar
2 Environment Canada. Reference method for determining acute lethality of effluents to Daphnia magna. Rep. EPS. 1/RM/14. Ottawa (Ont): Environment Canada; 2000. Google Scholar
3 American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard guide for conducting Daphnia magna life-cycle toxicity tests. E1193-97 (2012). In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 11.06. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2012. Google Scholar
4 International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Water quality—Determination of the inhibition of the mobility of Daphnia magna Straus (Cladocera, Crustacea)—Acute toxicity test; ISO 6341. Paris (France): ISO; 2012. Google Scholar
5 Wang HY, Olmstead AW, Li H, LeBlanc GA. The screening of chemicals for juvenoid-related endocrine activity using the water flea Daphnia magna. Aquatic Toxicol. 2005;74(3):193–204. Google Scholar
6 Pennak RW. Freshwater invertebrates of the United States. 3rd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1989. Google Scholar
8711 A. Introduction Bibliography
Anderson BG, Lumer H, Zupancic LJ Jr. Growth and variability in Daphnia pulex. Biol Bull. 1937;73(3):444–463. Google Scholar
Anderson BG, Jenkins JC. 1942. A time study of the events in the life span of Daphnia pulex. Biol. Bull. 83(2):260–272. Google Scholar
Adema DMM. Daphnia magna as a test animal in acute and chronic toxicity tests. Hydrobiologia. 1978;59:125–134. Google Scholar
Doma S. Ephippia of Daphnia magna Straus—A technique for their mass production and quick revival. Hydrobiologia. 1979;67:183–188. Google Scholar
Schwartz SS, Ballinger RE. Variations in life history characteristics of Daphnia pulex fed different algal species. Oecologia. 1980;44:181–184. Google Scholar
Carvalho GR, Hughes RN. The effect of food availability, female culture-density and photoperiod on ephippia production in Daphnia magna Straus (Crustacea: Cladocera). Freshwater Biol. 1983;13(1):37–46. Google Scholar
Korpelainen H. The effects of temperature and photoperiod on life history parameters of Daphnia magna (Crustacea: Cladocera). Freshwater Biol. 1985;16(5):615–620. Google Scholar
8711 B. Selecting and Prepaparing Test Organisms References
1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms, 5th ed. EPA-821-R-02-12. Washington DC: Office of Water; 2002. Google Scholar
2. Lewis PA, Weber CI. A study of the reliability of Daphnia acute toxicity tests. In: Cardwell RD, Purdy R, Bahner RC, eds., Seventh Symposium on Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment; ASTM STP 854. Philadelphia (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials; 1985. Google Scholar
3. Goulden CE, Comotto RM, Hendrickson Jr JA, Hornig LL, Johnson KL. Procedure and recommendations for the culture and use of Daphnia in bioassay studies. In: Pearson JG, Foster RB, Bishop WE, eds. Aquatic toxicology and hazard assessment: Fifth Symposium on Aquatic Toxicology; ASTM STP 766. Philadelphia (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials; 1982. Google Scholar
8711 B. Selecting and Prepaparing Test Organisms Bibliography
Taub FB, Dollar AM. The nutritional inadequacy of Chlorella and Chlamydomonas as food for Daphnia pulex. Limnol Oceanogr. 1968;13:607–617. Google Scholar
David P, Ozburn GW. The pH tolerance of Daphnia pulex (Leydig, emend., Richard). Can J Zool. 1969;47(6):1173–1175. Google Scholar
Biesinger KE, Christensen GM. Effects of various metals on survival, growth, reproduction, and metabolism of Daphnia magna. J Fish Res Board Can. 1972;29(12):1691–1700. Google Scholar
Winner RW, Keeling T, Yeager R, Farrell MP. Effect of food type on the acute and chronic toxicity of copper to Daphnia magna. Freshwater Biol. 1977;7(4):343–349. Google Scholar
Ten Berge WF. Breeding Daphnia magna. Hydrobiologia. 1978;59:121–123. Google Scholar
Parent S, Cheetham RD. Effects of acid precipitation on Daphnia magna. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1980;25:298–304. Google Scholar
Schultz TW, Freeman SR, Dumont NN. Uptake, depuration, and distribution of selenium in Daphnia and its effects on survival and ultrastructure. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1980;9:23–40. Google Scholar
Alibone MR, Fair P. The effects of low pH on the respiration of Daphnia magna (Straus). Hydrobiologia. 1981;85:185–188. Google Scholar
Gophen M, Gold B. The use of inorganic substances to stimulate gut evacuation in Daphnia magna. Hydrobiologia. 1981;80:4345. Google Scholar
Havas M. Physiological response of aquatic animals to low pH. In: Singer R, ed. Effects of acidic precipitation on benthos. Springfield (IL): North American Benthological Society; 1981. Google Scholar
Leonhard SL, Lawrence SC. Daphnia magna (Straus), Daphnia pulex (Leydig) Richard. In: Lawrence SG, ed. Manual for the culture of selected freshwater invertebrates. Ottawa: Department of Fisheries and Oceans; 1981, p. 31–50. (Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54) Google Scholar
France RL. Comment on Daphnia respiration in low pH water. Hydrobiologia. 1982;94:195–198. Google Scholar
Walton WE, Compton SM, Allan JD, Daniels RE. The effect of acid stress on survivorship and reproduction of Daphnia pulex (Crustacea: Cladocera). Can J Zool. 1982;60(4):573–579. Google Scholar
8711 C. Toxicity Test Procedures References
1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms, 5th ed. EPA 821-R-02-12. Washington, D.C. Office of Water; 2002. Google Scholar
2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) regulations for nonclinical laboratory studies. 21 CFR, Part 58. Google Scholar
3. Chemical safety and biosafety: testing of chemicals. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. [updated 26 June 2020; accessed 29 Dec 2020]. https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/ Google Scholar
4. Garner WY, Barge MS. Good Laboratory Practices—an agrochemical perspective. ACS Symposium Series 369. Washington, D.C: American Chemical Society; 1988. Google Scholar
5. Greene JC, Bartels CL, Warren-Hicks WJ, Parkhurst BR, Linder GL, Peterson SA, Miller WE. Protocols for short term toxicity screening of hazardous waste sites; EPA-600/3-88-029. Corvallis (OR): Environmental Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1988. Google Scholar
6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Good laboratory practice standards for health effects, Paragraph 772.1110-1, Part 772: Standards for development of test data. Fed. Reg. 44:27362; 1979. Google Scholar
7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Good laboratory practice standards. 40 CFR Part 792. Google Scholar
8711 C. Toxicity Test Procedures Bibliography
Porcella DB. Protocol for bioassessment of hazardous waste sites; EPA-600/2-83-054. Corvallis (OR): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1983. Google Scholar
DeWoskin RS. Good Laboratory Practice regulations: a comparison. Research Triangle Park (NC): Research Triangle Institute; 1984. Google Scholar
Biesinger KE, Williams LR, van der Schalie HW. Procedures for conducting Daphnia pulex toxicity bioassays; EPA-600/8-87-011. Las Vegas (NV): Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1987. Google Scholar
Weber CI, Peltier WH, Norberg-King TJ, Horning WB, Kessler FA, Menkedick JR, Neiheisel TW, Lewis PA, Klemm DJ, Pickering QH, et al. 1989. Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters for freshwater organisms, 2nd ed.; EPA-600/4-89-001. Cincinnati (OH): Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1989. Google Scholar
Gersich FM, Millazo DP. 1990. Evaluations of a 14-day static renewal toxicity test with Daphnia magna Straus. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 19:72–76. Google Scholar
Goulden CE, Henry LL. Ceriodaphnia and Daphnia bioassay workshop manual. Philadelphia (PA): Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia; 1990. Google Scholar
Masters JA, Lewis MA, Davidson DH. Validation of a four-day Ceriodaphnia toxicity test and statistical considerations in data analysis. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1991;10(1):47–55. Google Scholar
Helsel DR, Hirsch KM. Statistical methods in water resources. In: Techniques of water-resources investigations of the United States Geological Survey. Washington DC: U.S. Geological Survey; 2002, Book 4, Chapter A3. Google Scholar
American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard guide for conducting acute toxicity tests on test materials with fishes, macroinvertebrates and amphibians; ASTM E729-96 (2002). In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 11.05. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2004. Google Scholar
Guidance document to statistical methods for environmental toxicity tests; Report EPS 1/RM/46. Ottawa (Ont): Environment Canada; 2005 (with 2007 amendments). Google Scholar

Related

No related items

TAGGED IN:

  • Biological

TOOLS

CITATION

Standard Methods Committee of the American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation. 8711 daphnia In: Standard Methods For the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Lipps WC, Baxter TE, Braun-Howland E, editors. Washington DC: APHA Press.

DOI: 10.2105/SMWW.2882.169

SHARE

FROM THE DISCUSSION FORUM: