The content presented here represents the most current version of this section, which was printed in the 24th edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.

8712 CERIODAPHNIA

CopyRight

8712 A. Introduction References
1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms, 5th ed.; EPA-821-R-02-012. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002. Google Scholar
2. Pennak RW. Freshwater invertebrates of the United States, 3rd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1989. Google Scholar
3. Mount DI, Norberg TJ. A seven-day life-cycle cladoceran toxicity test. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1984;3(3):425–434. Google Scholar
4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater organisms, 1st ed.; EPA/600/4-85/014. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1985. Google Scholar
5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater organisms, 4th ed.; EPA-821-R-02-013. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2002. Google Scholar
6. American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard guide for conducting three-brood, renewal toxicity tests with Ceriodaphnia dubia; E1295-01. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 11.06. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2009. Google Scholar
7. Biological test method: test of reproduction and survival using the cladoceran Ceriodaphnia dubia, 2nd ed.; Rep. EPS 1/RM/21. Ottawa (ONT): Environment Canada; 2007. Google Scholar
8. Cowgill UM, Keating KI, Takahashi IT. Fecundity and longevity of Ceriodaphnia dubia/affinis in relation to diet at two different temperatures. J Crust Biol. 1985;5(3):420–429. Google Scholar
8712 A. Introduction Bibliography
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1984. Development of water- quality based permit limitations for toxic pollutants: National policy. Fed. Reg. 49:9016. Google Scholar
DeGraeve GM, Cooney JD. Ceriodaphnia: An update on effluent toxicity testing and research needs. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1987;6(5): 331–333. Google Scholar
8712 B. Selecting and Preparing Test Organisms References
1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms, 5th ed. EPA-821-R-02-012. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2002. Google Scholar
2. Biological test method: test of reproduction and survival using the cladoceran Ceriodaphnia dubia, 2nd ed. Rep. EPS 1/RM/21. Ottawa (ONT): Environment Canada; 2007. Google Scholar
3. DeGraeve GM, Cooney JD. Ceriodaphnia: An update on effluent toxicity testing and research needs. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1987;6(5): 331–333. Google Scholar
4. Keating KI, Caffrey PB, Schultz KA. Inherent problems in reconstituted water. In: Cowgill UM, Williams LR, eds. Aquatic toxicology and hazard assessment: 12th Volume; ASTM STP 1027. Philadelphia (PA): American Society of Testing and Materials; 1989, p. 367–378. Google Scholar
5. Laboratory guidance and whole effluent toxicity test review criteria; Pub. No. WQ-R-95-80. Olympia (WA): Washington State Department of Ecology; 2008. Google Scholar
8712 B. Selecting and Preparing Test Organisms Bibliography
Keating KI, Dagbusan BC. Effect of selenium deficiency on cuticle integrity in the cladocera (Crustacea). Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1984;81:3433–3437. Google Scholar
Cooney JD, Pollock TL, DeGraeve GM, Moore EL, Palmer WD. Effects of food and water quality on culturing of Ceriodaphnia dubia. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1992;11(6):823–837. Google Scholar
Knight JT, Waller WT. Influence of the addition of Cerophyl® on the Selenastrum capricornutum diet of the cladoceran Ceriodaphnia dubia. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1992;11(4):521–534. Google Scholar
Patterson PW, Dickson KL, Waller WT, Rodgers JH Jr. The effect of nine diet and water combinations on the culture health of Ceriodaphnia dubia. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1992;11(7):1023–1035. Google Scholar
American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard guide for conducting three-brood, renewal toxicity tests with Ceriodaphnia dubia; E1295-01. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 11.06. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2009. Google Scholar
8712 C. Toxicity Test Procedures References
1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms, 5th ed.; EPA-821-R-02-012. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2002. Google Scholar
2. Laboratory guidance and whole effluent toxicity test review criteria; Pub. No. WQ-R-95-80. Olympia (WA): Washington State Department of Ecology; 2008. Google Scholar
3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater organisms, 4th ed.; EPA-821-R-02-013. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2002. Google Scholar
4. Biological test method: test of reproduction and survival using the cladoceran Ceriodaphnia dubia, 2nd ed.; Rep. EPS 1/RM/21. Ottawa (ONT): Environment Canada; 2007. Google Scholar
5. Food and Drug Administration. Good laboratory practice (GLP) regulations for nonclinical laboratory studies. 1987. 21 CFR, Part 58. Google Scholar
6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Good laboratory practice standards. 1989. 40 CFR, Parts 160 and 792. Google Scholar
7. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Principles of good laboratory practice, Annex 2, OECD. guidelines for testing of chemicals C(81) 30(Final). Offic J Europ Commun. 1989;32(315):1. Google Scholar
8. Garner WY, Barge MS, eds. Good laboratory practice–an agrochemical perspective; ACS Symposium Series 369. Washington DC: American Chemical Society; 1988. Google Scholar
8712 C. Toxicity Test Procedures Bibliography
Stephan CE, Rogers JW. Advantages of using regression analysis to calculate results of chronic toxicity tests. In: Bahner RC, Hansen DJ, eds. Aquatic toxicity and hazard assessment. 8th Symposium on Aquatic Toxicology; ASTM STP 891. Philadelphia (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials; 1985. Google Scholar
Stephen CE. Topics on expressing and predicting results of life cycle tests. In: Sutter II GW, Lewis MA, eds. Aquatic toxicology and environmental fate. 11th Symposium on Aquatic Toxicology; ASTM STP 1007. Philadelphia (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials; 1989. Google Scholar
Masters JA, Lewis MA, Davidson DH, Bruce RD. Validation of a four-day Ceriodaphnia toxicity test and statistical considerations in data analysis. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1991;10(1):47–55. Google Scholar
Cooney JD, DeGraeve GM, Moore EL, Lenoble BJ, Pollock TL, Smith GJ. 1992. Effects of environmental and experimental design factors on culturing and toxicity testing of Ceriodaphnia dubia. Environ Toxicol Chem. 11(6):839–850. Google Scholar
DeGraeve GM, Cooney JD, Marsh BH, Pollock TL, Reichenbach NG. Variability in the performance of the 7-d Ceriodaphnia dubia survival and reproduction test: An intra- and interlaboratory study. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1992;11(6):851–866. Google Scholar
Crane M, Newman MC. What level of effect is a no observed effect? Environ Toxicol Chem. 2000;19(2):516–519. Google Scholar
Diamond J, Daley C. What is the relationship between whole effluent toxicity and instream biological condition? Environ Toxicol Chem. 2000;19(1):158–168. Google Scholar
LaPoint TW, Waller WT. Field assessments in conjunction with whole effluent testing. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2000;19(1):14–24. Google Scholar
Markle PJ, Gully JR, Baird RB, Nakada KM, Bottomley JP. Effects of several variables on whole effluent toxicity test performance and interpretation. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2000;19(1):123–132. Google Scholar

Related

No related items

TAGGED IN:

  • Biological

TOOLS

CITATION

Standard Methods Committee of the American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation. 8712 ceriodaphnia In: Standard Methods For the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Lipps WC, Baxter TE, Braun-Howland E, editors. Washington DC: APHA Press.

DOI: 10.2105/SMWW.2882.170

SHARE

FROM THE DISCUSSION FORUM: