1. Farmer JJ III, Boatwright KD, Janda JM. Enterobacteriaceae: Introduction and identification. In: Manual of clinical microbiology, 9th ed. Washington DC: Amer Soc Microbiol Press; 2007. Google Scholar

2. Brenner DJ, Farmer JJ III. Family 1. Enterobacteriaceae. In: Bergey’s Manual of systematic bacteriology, 2nd ed. Vol. 2: The Proteobacteria, Part B: The Gammaproteobacteria. Secaucus (NJ): Springer; 2005. Google Scholar

3. Farmer JJ III, Farmer MK, Holmes B. The Enterobacteriaceae: general characteristics. In: Topley & Wilson’s microbiology and microbial infections, 10th ed. Chapter 51. London, (UK): Hodder Arnold, 2005. (Vol. 2: Bacteriology). Google Scholar

4. Janda JM, Abbott SL. The Enterobacteria, 2nd ed. Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2006. Google Scholar

5. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J System Evolution Microbiol. 2020;70:5607–5612. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004332 Google Scholar

6. Edberg SC, Allen MJ, Smith DB. Comparison of the Colilert® method and standard fecal coliform methods; Report No. 90647. Denver (CO): AWWA Research Foundation & American Water Works Association; 1994. Google Scholar

Ptak DJ, Ginsburg W, Willey BF. Aeromonas, the great masquerader. In: Proceedings of the AWWA Water Quality Technology Conference, Dec. 2–3, 1974, Dallas, Texas. Denver (CO): American Water Works Association; 1974, p. V-1. Google Scholar

Van Der Kooj D. Properties of aeromonads and their occurrence and hygienic significance in drinking water. Zentralbl Bacterial Hyg B. 1988;187(1):1–17. Google Scholar

Hartman PA, Swaminathan B, Curiale MS, Firstenberg-Eden R, Sharpe AN, Cox NA, Fung DYC, Goldschmidt MC. Rapid methods and automation. In: Vanderzant C, Splittstoesser DF, eds., Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods, 3rd. ed. Washington DC: American Public Health Association; 1992, pp. 665. Google Scholar

Stager CE, Davis JR. Automated systems for identification of microorganisms. Clin Microbial Rev. 1992;5(3):302–327. Google Scholar

Rice EW, Allen MJ, Covert TC, Langewis J, Standridge J. Identifying Escherichia species with biochemical test kits and standard bacteriological tests. J Amer Water Works Assoc. 1993;85(2):74–76. Google Scholar

1. Brenner DJ, Farmer JJ III. Family 1. Enterobacteriaceae. In: Bergey’s Manual of systematic bacteriology, 2nd ed. Vol. 2: The Proteobacteria, Part B: The Gammaproteobacteria. Secaucus (NJ): Springer; 2005. Google Scholar

2. Farmer JJ III, Boatwright KD, Janda JM. Enterobacteriaceae: introduction and identification. In: Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 9th ed. Chapter 42. Washington DC: ASM Press, 2007. Google Scholar

3. Farmer JJ III, Farmer MK, Holmes B. The Enterobacteriaceae: general characteristics. In: Topley & Wilson’s microbiology and microbial infections, 10th ed. Chapter 51. London, (UK): Hodder Arnold, 2005. (Vol. 2: Bacteriology). Google Scholar

4. Janda JM, Abbott SL. The Enterobacteria, 2nd ed. Washington DC: ASM Press, 2006. Google Scholar

5. Farmer JJ III, Asbury MA, Hickman EW, Brenner DJ; Enterobacteriaceae Study Group. Enterobacter sakazakii: A new species of “Enterobacteriaceae” isolated from clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1980;30(3):569–584. Google Scholar

6. Bryant T. PBWin. Software for identifying bacteria [accessed 05 May 2022]. https://edshare.soton.ac.uk/5310/ Google Scholar

7. O’Hara CM. Manual and automated instrumentation for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and other aerobic Gram-negative bacilli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(1):147–162. Google Scholar

8. Carroll KC, Weinstein MP. Manual and automated systems for the detection and identification of microorganisms. In: Manual of clinical microbiology, 9th ed. Chapter 15. Washington DC: ASM Press, 2007. Google Scholar

9. Woo PC, Ng KH, Lau SK, Yip KT, Fung AM, Leung KW, Tam DM, Que TL, Yuen KY. Usefulness of the MicroSeq 500 16S ribosomal DNA-based bacterial identification system for identification of clinically significant bacterial isolates with ambiguous biochemical profiles. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(5):1996–2001. Google Scholar

Iversen C, Lancashire L, Waddington M, Forsythe S, Ball G. Identification of Enterobacter sakazakii from closely related species: the use of artificial neural networks in the analysis of biochemical and 16sDNA data. BMC Microbiol. 2006;6:28. Google Scholar

1. Farmer JJ III, Boatwright KD, Janda JM. Enterobacteriaceae: introduction and identification. In: Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 9th ed. Chapter 42. Washington DC: ASM Press, 2007. Google Scholar

2. Farmer JJ III, Asbury MA, Hickman EW, Brenner DJ; Enterobacteriaceae Study Group. Enterobacter sakazakii: A new species of “Enterobacteriaceae” isolated from clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1980;30(3):569–584. Google Scholar

3. LaPage SP, Bascomb S, Willcox WR, Curtis MA. Identification of bacteria by computer: general aspects and perspectives. J Gen Microbiol. 1973;77(2):273–290. Google Scholar

4. Holmes B, Costas M. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by computerized methods. In: Identification methods in applied and environmental microbiology. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Scientific; 1992. Google Scholar

O’Hara CM. Manual and automated instrumentation for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and other aerobic Gram-negative bacilli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(1):147–162. Google Scholar

Identification of Enterobacteriaceae. National Standard Method BSOP ID 16:2. Health Protection Agency, 2007. Google Scholar

Murray PR, ed. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. Washington DC: ASM Press; 2007. Google Scholar

Health Protection Agency. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae; National Standard Method BSOP ID 16:3; 2010. Google Scholar