1. Klemm DJ, Lewis PA, Fulk F, Lazorchak JM. Macroinvertebrate field and laboratory methods for evaluating the biological integrity of surface waters; EPA-600/4-90-030. Cincinnati (OH): Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1990. Google Scholar

2. Wetzel RG, Likens GE. Limnological analyses. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 1991. Google Scholar

3. Plante C, Downing JA. Production of freshwater invertebrate populations in lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1989;46(9):1489–1498. Google Scholar

4. Plante C, Downing JA. Empirical evidence for differences among methods for calculating secondary production. J N Amer Benthol Soc. 1990;9(1):9–16. Google Scholar

5. Gibson GR, ed. Biological criteria. In: Technical guidance for streams and small rivers; EPA-822-B-96-001. Washington DC: Office of Science and Technology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1996. Google Scholar

6. Plafkin JL, Barbour MT, Porter KD, Gross SK, Hughes RM. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers. In: Benthic macroinvertebrates and fish; EPA-440/4-89-001. Washington DC: Assessment and Watershed Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1989. Google Scholar

7. Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish; EPA 841-B-99-002. Washington DC: Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1999. Google Scholar

8. Lazorchak JM, Klemm DJ, Peck DV. Environmental monitoring and assessment program-surface waters: field operations and methods for measuring the ecological conditions of wadeable streams; EPA 620-R-94-004F. Cincinnati (OH): National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Corvallis (OR): National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1998. Google Scholar

9. Barbour MT. Perspectives from North America on the programmatic and scientific elements of an effective bioassessment. Human Ecol Risk Assess. 1997;3:929–931. Google Scholar

Hynes HBN. The biology of polluted waters. England: Liverpool University Press; 1963. Google Scholar

Macan TT. Freshwater ecology. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1963. Google Scholar

Ruttner F. Fundamentals of limnology. Ontario: University of Toronto Press; 1966. Google Scholar

Mackenthun KM, Ingram WM. Biological associated problems in freshwater environments. Washington DC: Federal Water Pollution Control Administration; 1967. Google Scholar

Hynes HBN. The ecology of running waters. Ontario: University of Toronto Press; 1970. Google Scholar

Odum EP. Fundamentals of ecology, 3rd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders Publishing Co.; 1971. Google Scholar

Coull BC, ed. Ecology of marine benthos. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press; 1977. Google Scholar

Pearson TH, Rosenberg R. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev. 1978;16:229–311. Google Scholar

Brower JR, Zar JH. Field and laboratory methods for general ecology. Dubuque (IA): Wm. C. Brown Publishers; 1984. Google Scholar

Resh VH, Rosenberg DM. The ecology of aquatic insects. New York (NY): Praeger Publishers; 1984. Google Scholar

Ward JV. Ecological perspectives in the management of aquatic insects. In: Resh VH, Rosenberg DM, editors. The ecology of aquatic insects. New York (NY): Praeger Scientific; 1984, p. 558. Google Scholar

Wiederholm T. Responses of aquatic insects to environmental pollution. In Resh VH, Rosenberg DM, editors. The ecology of aquatic insects. New York (NY): Praeger Scientific; 1984, p. 508. Google Scholar

Cummins KW, Wilzbach MA. Field procedures for analysis of functional feeding groups of stream macroinvertebrates (Contribution 1611). Frostburg (MD): Appalachian Environmental Laboratory, University of Maryland; 1985. Google Scholar

Leonard PM, Orth DJ. Application and testing of an index of biotic integrity in small, coolwater streams. Trans Amer Fish Soc. 1986;115(3):401–414. Google Scholar

Warwick RM. A new method for detecting pollution effects on marine macrobenthic communities. Mar Biol. 1986;92(4):557–562. Google Scholar

Hilsenhoff WL. An improved biotic index of organic stream pollution. Great Lakes Entomol. 1987;20(1):31–39. Google Scholar

Rohm CM, Giese JW, Bennett CC. Evaluation of an aquatic ecoregion classification of streams in Arkansas. J Freshwater Ecol. 1987;4(1):127–140. Google Scholar

Shackelford B. Rapid bioassessments of lotic macroinvertebrate communities: biocriteria development. Little Rock (AR): Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology; 1988. Google Scholar

Steedman RJ. Modification and assessment of an index of biotic integrity to quantify stream quality in southern Ontario. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1988;45(3):492–501. Google Scholar

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Proceedings of the 1st National Workshop on Biological Criteria; 1987 Dec 2–4; Lincolnwood, IL (Report No.: 905/9-89/003). Chicago, (IL); 1988. Google Scholar

Whittier TR, Hughes RM, Larsen DP. Correspondence between ecoregions and spatial patterns in stream ecosystems in Oregon. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1988;45(7):1264–1278. Google Scholar

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life: Vol. 3. Standardized biological field sampling and laboratory methods for assessing fish and macroinvertebrate communities. Columbus (OH): Division of Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment, Surface Water Section; 1989. Google Scholar

Reynoldson TB, Schloesser DW, Manny BA. Development of a benthic invertebrate objective for mesotrophic Great Lakes waters. J Great Lakes Res. 1989;15(4):669–686. Google Scholar

Burd BJ, Nemec A, Brinkhurst RO. The development and application of analytical methods in benthic marine infaunal studies. Adv Mar Biol. 1990;26:169–247. Google Scholar

National Research Council. Managing troubled waters: the role of marine environmental monitoring. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1990. Google Scholar

Weston DP. Quantitative examination of macrobenthic community changes along an organic enrichment gradient. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1990;61(3):233–244. Google Scholar

Yount JD, Niemi GJ. Recovery of lotic communities and ecosystems from disturbance—a narrative review of case studies. Environ Manage. 1990;14(5):547–569. Google Scholar

Karr JR, Kerans BL. Components of biological integrity: their definition and use in development of an invertebrate IBI. In: Simon TP, David WS, editors. Environmental indicators: measurement and assessment endpoints, Chapter 1 (EPA 905-R-92-003). Chicago (IL): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1992. Google Scholar

Blake JA, Lissner A. Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and western Santa Barbara Channel, Vol. 1. Santa Barbara (CA): Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History; 1993. Google Scholar

Cairns J Jr, McCormick PV, Niederlehner BR. A proposed framework for developing indicators of ecosystem health. Hydrobiologia. 1993;263:1–44. Google Scholar

Rosenberg DM, Resh VH, editors. Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. New York (NY): Chapman-Hall; 1993. Google Scholar

Gurtz ME. Design of biological components of the National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program. In: Loeb SL, Spacie A, editors. Biological monitoring of aquatic systems. Ann Arbor (MI): Lewis Publishers; 1994. Google Scholar

Davis WS, Simon TP, editors. Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision making. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis Publishers; 1995. Google Scholar

Hauer FR, Lamberti GA, editors. Methods in stream ecology. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1996. Google Scholar

Karr JR. Aquatic invertebrates: sentinels of watershed condition. Wings. 1996;19(2):22. Google Scholar

Patrick R. Rivers of the United States: Vol. 3: The eastern and southeastern States. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1996. Google Scholar

Pepper IL, Gerba CP, Brusseau ML. Pollution science. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 1996. Google Scholar

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Biological criteria: technical guidance for streams and small rivers (EPA 822-B-96-001). Washington (DC): Office of Science and Technology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1996. Google Scholar

Barbour MT. The re-invention of biological assessment in the U.S. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 1997;3(6):933–940. Google Scholar

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Priorities for ecological protection: an initial list and discussion document for EPA (EPA 600-S-97-002). Washington (DC): Office of the Research and Development; 1997. Google Scholar

MacBroom JG. The river book. Hartford (CT): Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection; 1998. Google Scholar

Patrick R. The Mississippi River and its tributaries north of St. Louis, Vol. 4, Part A. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1998. Google Scholar

Patrick R. The Mississippi River and its tributaries south of St. Louis, Vol. 4, Part B. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1998. Google Scholar

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Lake and reservoir bioassessment and biocriteria, technical guidance document (EPA 841-B-98-007). Washington (DC): Office of Water; 1998. Google Scholar

Batzer DP, Rader RB, Wissinger SA. Invertebrates in freshwater wetlands of North America: ecology and management. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1999. Google Scholar

Griffiths RW. BioMAP: bioassessment of water quality. Niagara-on-the-Lake (Canada): Centre for Environmental Training, Niagara College; 1999. Google Scholar

Karr JR, Chu EW. Restoring life in running waters. Washington (DC): Island Press; 1999. Google Scholar

Gerritsen J, Jessup B, Leppo EW, White J. Development of lake condition indexes (LCI) for Florida (Tetra Tech, Inc., Owings Mills, Md., Appendices A-1 to B-13). Tallahassee (FL): Florida Department Environmental Protection, Stormwater/Nonpoint Source Management Section; 2000. Google Scholar

1. Alden RW III, Weisberg SB, Ranasinghe JA, Dauer DM. Optimizing temporal sampling strategies for benthic environmental monitoring programs. Mar Pollut Bull. 1997;34(11):913–922. Google Scholar

2. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods. Ames (IA): Iowa State University Press; 1967. Google Scholar

3. Klemm DJ, Lewis PA, Fulk F, Lazorchak JM. Macroinvertebrate field and laboratory methods for evaluating the biological integrity of surface waters (EPA-600/4-90-030). Cincinnati (OH): Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1990. Google Scholar

4. Green RH. Sampling design and statistical methods for environmental biologists. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1979. Google Scholar

5. Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1984. Google Scholar

6. Underwood AJ, Peterson CH. Towards an ecological framework for investigating pollution. Mar Ecol Progr Ser. 1988;46(1):227–234. Google Scholar

7. Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 1967;27:209–220. Google Scholar

8. Legendre P, Fortin MJ. Spatial patterns and ecological analysis. Vegetation. 1989;80(2):107–138. Google Scholar

9. Green RH, Boyd JM, MacDonald JS. Relating sets of variables in environmental studies: the sediment quality triad as a paradigm. Environmetrics. 1993;4(4):439–457. Google Scholar

10. Underwood AJ. On beyond BACI: sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances. Ecol Appl. 1994;4(1):3–15. Google Scholar

11. Landis WG, Matthews GB, Matthews RA, Sargent A. Application of multivariate techniques to endpoint determination, selection and evaluation in ecological risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1994;13(12):1917–1927. Google Scholar

12. Gaugush RF. 1987. Sampling design for reservoir water quality investigations. Instruction Rep. E-87-1. Vicksburg (MS): Waterways Experiment Station. Google Scholar

13. Mason WT Jr, Weber CI, Lewis PA, Julian EC. Factors affecting the performance of basket and multiplate macroinvertebrate samplers. Freshwater Biol. 1973;3(5):409–436. Google Scholar

14. Weber CI, ed. Biological field and laboratory methods for measuring the quality of surface waters and effluents. EPA-670/4-73-001. Cincinnati (OH): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1973. Google Scholar

15. Powers CF, Robertson A. Design and evaluation of an all-purpose benthos sampler (Special Report No. 30). Ann Arbor (MI): Great Lakes Research Division, University of Michigan; 1967. Google Scholar

16. Smith W, McIntyre AD. A spring-loaded bottom sampler. Mar Biol Association UK. 1954;33(1):257–264. Google Scholar

17. Elliott JM. Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates (Sci. Pub. No. 25). Ambleside: Freshwater Biological Association; 1971. Google Scholar

18. McIntyre AD. Efficiency of marine bottom samplers. In: Holme NA, McIntyre AD, editors. Methods for the study of marine benthos. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1984, p. 140. (IBP Handbook No. 16) Google Scholar

19. Wigley RL. Comparative efficiency of Van Veen and Smith-McIntyre grab samplers as recorded by motion pictures. Ecology. 1967;48(1):168–169. Google Scholar

20. Surber E. Rainbow trout and bottom fauna production in one mile of stream. Trans Amer Fish Soc. 1937;66(1):193–202. Google Scholar

21. Barnes H. Oceanographic and marine biology. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.; 1959. Google Scholar

22. Brinkhurst RO, Chua KE, Batoosingh E. Modifications in sampling procedures as applied to studies on the bacteria and tubificid oligochaetes inhabiting aquatic sediments. J Fish Res Board Can. 1969;26(10):2581–2593. Google Scholar

23. Holme NA, McIntyre AD, eds. Methods for the study of marine benthos. Oxford Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1984. (IBP Handbook No. 16) Google Scholar

24. Hessler RR, Jumars PA. Abyssal community analysis from replicate box cores in the central north Pacific. Deep Sea Res. 1974;21(3):185–209. Google Scholar

25. Probert PK. A comparison of macrofaunal samples taken by box corer and anchor-box dredge. New Zealand Oceanogr Inst Rec. 1984;4(13):149. Google Scholar

26. Elefteriou A, Holme NA. Macrofauna techniques. In: Holme NA, McIntyre AD, eds. Methods for the study of marine benthos. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1984, p. 140. (IBP Handbook No. 16, Chapter 6) Google Scholar

27. Gerdes D, Klages M, Arntz WE, Herman RL, Galerón J, Hain S. Quantitative investigations on macrobenthic communities of the southeastern Weddell Sea shelf based on multibox cored samples. Polar Biol. 1992;12:291–301. Google Scholar

28. Reynoldson TB, Hamilton AL. Historic changes in populations of burrowing mayflies (Hexagenia limbata) from Lake Erie based on sediment tusk profiles. J Great Lakes Res. 1993;19(2):250–257. Google Scholar

29. Wilding JL. A new square-foot aquatic sampler (Special Publication No. 4). Ann Arbor (MI): Limnological Society of America; 1940. Google Scholar

30. Kajak Z. Analysis of quantitative benthic methods. Ekol Polska (A). 1963;11:1–56. Google Scholar

31. Waters TF. Standing crop and drift of stream bottom organisms. Ecology. 1961;42(3):532–537. Google Scholar

32. Dimond JB. Pesticides and stream insects (Bulletin No. 2). Washington (DC): Maine Forest Service and the Conservation Foundation, Augusta; 1967. Google Scholar

33. Waters TF. The drift of stream insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 1972;17:253–267. Google Scholar

34. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life: Vol. 2, User’s manual for biological field assessment of Ohio surface waters: Vol. 3, Standardized biological field sampling and laboratory methods for assessing fish and macroinvertebrates communities. Columbus (OH): Division of Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment; 1989. Google Scholar

35. Frost S, Hun A, Kershaw W. Evaluation of a kicking technique for sampling stream bottom fauna. Can J Zool. 1971;49(2):167–173. Google Scholar

36. Crossman JS, Cairns J Jr, Kaesler RL. Aquatic invertebrate recovery in the clinch river following hazardous spills and floods (Water Resources Research Center Bulletin 63). Blacksburg (VI): Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 1973. Google Scholar

37. Welch PS. Limnological methods. Philadelphia (PA): Blakiston Co.; 1948. Google Scholar

38. Usinger RL. Aquatic insects of California, with keys to North American genera and California species. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press; 1956. Google Scholar

39. Beak TW, Griffing TC, Appleby G. Use of artificial substrates to assess water pollution. In: Proceedings of biological methods for the assessment of water quality. Philadelphia (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials; 1974. Google Scholar

40. Fullner RW. A comparison of macroinvertebrates collected by basket and modified multiple-plate samplers. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1971;43(3):494–499. Google Scholar

41. Hester FE, Dendy JB. A multiple-plate sampler for aquatic macroinvertebrates. Trans Amer Fish Soc. 1962;91(4):420–421. Google Scholar

42. Pullen EJ, Mock CR, Ringo RD. A net for sampling the intertidal zone of an estuary. Limnol Oceanogr. 1968;13(1):200–202. Google Scholar

43. Gale W, Thompson J. A suction sampler for quantitatively sampling benthos on rocky substrates in rivers. Trans Amer Fish Soc. 1975;104(2):398–405. Google Scholar

44. Larsen PF. A remotely operated shallow water benthic suction sampler. Chesapeake Sci. 1974;15(3):176–178. Google Scholar

45. Simmons GM Jr. The use of underwater equipment in freshwater research (VPI-SG-77-03). Blacksburg (VI): Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 1977. Google Scholar

Macan TT. Methods of sampling the bottom fauna in stony streams. Mitt Int Ver Limnol. 1958;8(1):1–21. Google Scholar

Dickson KL, Cairns J Jr, Arnold JC. An evaluation of the use of a basket type artificial substrate for sampling macroinvertebrate organisms. Trans Amer Fish Soc. 1971;100(3):553–559. Google Scholar

Washington HG. Diversity, biotic and similarity indices. A review with special relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Water Res. 1984:18(6):653–694. Google Scholar

Wrona FJ, Calow P, Ford T, Baird DJ, Maltby L. Estimating the abundance of stone-dwelling organisms: a new method. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1986;43(10):2025–2035. Google Scholar

Brittain JE, Eikeland TJ. Invertebrate drift—a review. Hydrobiologia. 1988;166(1):77–93. Google Scholar

Ferraro SP, Cole FA, DeBen WA, Swartz RC. Power-cost efficiency of eight macrobenthic sampling schemes in Puget Sound, Washington, USA. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1989;46(12):2157–2165. Google Scholar

Cuffney TF, Gurtz ME, Meador MR. Methods for collecting benthic invertebrate samples as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program (Open-File Rep. 93-405). Raleigh (NC): U.S. Geological Survey; 1993. Google Scholar

Scrimgeour GJ, Culp JM, Glozier NE. An improved technique for sampling lotic invertebrates. Hydrobiologia. 1993;254(2):65–71. Google Scholar

Hughes RM. Defining acceptable biological status by comparing with reference conditions. In: Davis WS, Simon T, editors. Biological assessment and criteria, tools for water resource planning and decision making, Chapter 4. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis Publishers; 1995, p. 31. Google Scholar

Reynoldson TB, Norris RH, Resh VH, Day KE, Rosen-burg DM. The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water-quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates. J N Amer Benthol Soc. 1997;16:833–852. Google Scholar

Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. 2nd ed. (EPA 841-B-99-002). Washington (DC): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water; 1999. Google Scholar

Heino J. Lentic macroinvertebrate assemblage structure along gradients in spatial heterogeneity, habitat size and water chemistry. Hydrobiologia. 2000;428:229–242. Google Scholar

Flotemersch JE, Autrey BC, Cormier SM. Comparison of boating and wading methods used to assess the status of flowing waters (EPA 600-R-00-108). Cincinnati (OH): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2001. Google Scholar

Flotemesch JE, Stribling JB, Paul MJ. Concepts and approaches for the bioassessment of non-wadeable streams and rivers (EPA 600-R-06-127). Cincinnati (OH): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2006. Google Scholar

ASTM D 4342-84: Standard practice for collecting of benthic macroinvertebrates with Ponar grab sampler. In: Standard guide for collection, storage, characterization, and manipulation of sediments for toxicological testing and selection of samplers used to collect benthic invertebrates (2010 Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 11.06: Biological effects and environmental fate; biotechnology). [Annex A1 in ASTM E1391-03 (Reapproved 2008)]. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010. Google Scholar

ASTM D 4343-84: Standard practice for collecting benthic macroinvertebrates with Ekman grab sampler. In: Standard guide for collection, storage, characterization, and manipulation of sediments for toxicological testing and selection of samplers used to collect benthic invertebrates (2010 Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 11.06: Biological effects and environmental fate; biotechnology). [Annex A1 in ASTM E1391-03 (Reapproved 2008)]. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010. Google Scholar

ASTM D 4344-84: Standard practice for collecting benthic macroinvertebrates with Smith-McIntyre grab sampler. In: Standard guide for collection, storage, characterization, and manipulation of sediments for toxicological testing and selection of samplers used to collect benthic invertebrates (2010 Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 11.06: Biological effects and environmental fate; biotechnology). [Annex A1 in ASTM E1391-03 (Reapproved 2008)]. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010. Google Scholar

ASTM D 4345-84: Standard practice for collecting benthic macroinvertebrates with Van Veen grab sampler. In: Standard guide for collection, storage, characterization, and manipulation of sediments for toxicological testing and selection of samplers used to collect benthic invertebrates (2010 Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 11.06: Biological effects and environmental fate; biotechnology). [Annex A1 in ASTM E1391-03 (Reapproved 2008)]. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010. Google Scholar

ASTM D 4346-84: Standard practice for collecting benthic macroinvertebrates with Okean 50 grab sampler. In: Standard guide for collection, storage, characterization, and manipulation of sediments for toxicological testing and selection of samplers used to collect benthic invertebrates (2010 Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 11.06: Biological effects and environmental fate; biotechnology). [Annex A1 in ASTM E1391-03 (Reapproved 2008)]. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010. Google Scholar

ASTM D 4347-84: Standard practice for collecting benthic macroinvertebrates with Shipek (scoop) grab sampler. In: Standard guide for collection, storage, characterization, and manipulation of sediments for toxicological testing and selection of samplers used to collect benthic invertebrates (2010 Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 11.06: Biological effects and environmental fate; biotechnology). [Annex A1 in ASTM E1391-03 (Reapproved 2008)]. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010. Google Scholar

ASTM D 4348-84: Standard practice for collecting benthic macroinvertebrates with Holme (scoop) grab sampler. In: Standard guide for collection, storage, characterization, and manipulation of sediments for toxicological testing and selection of samplers used to collect benthic invertebrates (2010 Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 11.06: Biological effects and environmental fate; biotechnology). [Annex A1 in ASTM E1391-03 (Reapproved 2008)]. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010. Google Scholar

ASTM D 4387-84: Standard guide for selecting grab sampling devices for collecting benthic macrovinvertebrates. In: Standard guide for collection, storage, characterization, and manipulation of sediments for toxicological testing and selection of samplers used to collect benthic invertebrates (2010 Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 11.06: Biological effects and environmental fate; biotechnology). [Annex A1 in ASTM E1391-03 (Reapproved 2008)]. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010. Google Scholar

ASTM D 4401-84: Standard practice for collecting benthic macroinvertebrates with Petersen grab sampler. In: Standard guide for collection, storage, characterization, and manipulation of sediments for toxicological testing and selection of samplers used to collect benthic invertebrates (2010 Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 11.06: Biological effects and environmental fate; biotechnology). [Annex A1 in ASTM E1391-03 (Reapproved 2008)]. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010. Google Scholar

ASTM D 4407-84: Standard practice for collecting benthic macroinvertebrates with orange peel grab sampler. In: Standard guide for collection, storage, characterization, and manipulation of sediments for toxicological testing and selection of samplers used to collect benthic invertebrates (2010 Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 11.06: Biological effects and environmental fate; biotechnology). [Annex A1 in ASTM E1391-03 (Reapproved 2008)]. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010. Google Scholar

ASTM D 4556-85: Standard guide for selecting stream-net sampling devices for collecting benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Standard guide for collection, storage, characterization, and manipulation of sediments for toxicological testing and selection of samplers used to collect benthic invertebrates (2010 Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 11.06: Biological effects and environmental fate; biotechnology). [Annex A1 in ASTM E1391-03 (Reapproved 2008)]. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010. Google Scholar

ASTM D 4557-85: Standard practice for collecting benthic macroinvertebrates with Surber and related type samplers. In: Standard guide for collection, storage, characterization, and manipulation of sediments for toxicological testing and selection of samplers used to collect benthic invertebrates (2010 Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 11.06: Biological effects and environmental fate; biotechnology). [Annex A1 in ASTM E1391-03 (Reapproved 2008)]. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010. Google Scholar

ASTM D 4558-85: Standard practice for collecting benthic macroinvertebrates with drift nets. In: Standard guide for collection, storage, characterization, and manipulation of sediments for toxicological testing and selection of samplers used to collect benthic invertebrates (2010 Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 11.06: Biological effects and environmental fate; biotechnology). [Annex A1 in ASTM E1391-03 (Reapproved 2008)]. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010. Google Scholar

ASTM E 1468-92: Standard practice for collecting benthic macroinvertebrates with basket sampler. In: Standard guide for collection, storage, characterization, and manipulation of sediments for toxicological testing and selection of samplers used to collect benthic invertebrates (2010 Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 11.06: Biological effects and environmental fate; biotechnology). [Annex A1 in ASTM E1391-03 (Reapproved 2008)]. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010. Google Scholar

ASTM E 1469-92: Standard practice for collecting benthic macroinvertebrates with multiplate sampler. In: Standard guide for collection, storage, characterization, and manipulation of sediments for toxicological testing and selection of samplers used to collect benthic invertebrates (2010 Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 11.06: Biological effects and environmental fate; biotechnology). [Annex A1 in ASTM E1391-03 (Reapproved 2008)]. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010. Google Scholar

1. Worswick JM, Barbour MT. An elutriation apparatus for macroinvertebrates. Limnol Oceanogr. 1974;19(3):538–540. Google Scholar

2. Lauff GH, Cummins KW, Eriksen CH, Parker M. A method for sorting bottom fauna samples by elutriation. Limnol Oceanogr. 1961;6(4):462–466. Google Scholar

3. Edmondson WT, ed. Ward and Whipple’s freshwater biology. 2nd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1959. Google Scholar

4. Cook DG, Brinkhurst RO. Marine Flora and Fauna of the Northeastern United States, Annelida: Oligochaeta; NOAA Technical Report (NMFS CIRC-374). Seattle (WA): US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service; 1973. Google Scholar

5. Klemm DJ. Leeches (Annelida:Hirudinea) of North America; EPA-600/3-82-025. Cincinnati (OH): Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency; 1982. Google Scholar

6. Pennak RW. Freshwater invertebrates of the United States—Protozoa to Mollusca. 3rd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1989. Google Scholar

7. Burch JB. Freshwater sphaeriacean clams (Mollusca:Pelecypoda) of North America. Cincinnati (OH): US Environmental Protection Agency; 1972. Google Scholar

8. Klemm DJ, ed. A guide to the freshwater annelida (Polychaeta, Naidid and Tubificid Oligochaeta, and Hirudinea) of North America. Dubuque (IA): Kendall Hunt Publishing Company; 1985. Google Scholar

9. Kathman RD, Brinkhurst RO. Guide to the freshwater oligochaetes of North America. College Grove (TN): Aquatic Resources Center; 1998. Google Scholar

10. Mason WT Jr, Yevich PP. The use of phloxine B and rose bengal stains to facilitate sorting benthic samples. Trans Amer Microsc Soc. 1967;86(2):221–223. Google Scholar

Pettibone MH. Marine polychaete worms of the New England region. I. Aphroditidae through Trochochaetidae. Bull US Natl Mus. 1963;227(1):1–356. Google Scholar

Smith RI, ed. Keys to marine invertebrates of the Woods Hole Region (Contrib. No. 11). Woods Hole (MA): Systematics-Ecology Program, Marine Biological Laboratory; 1964. Google Scholar

McCain JC. The caprellidae (Crustacea:Amphipoda) of the western North Atlantic (Bulletin no. 278). Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institute; 1968. Google Scholar

Schultz GA. How to know the marine isopod crustaceans. Dubuque (IA): Wm. C. Brown Company Publishers; 1969. Google Scholar

Foster NM. Spionidae (polychaeta) of the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea. Studies on the fauna of Curaçao and other Caribbean islands. Vitg Natuurw Studkring Suriname. 1971;36(129):1–183. Google Scholar

Gosner KL. Guide to identification of marine and estuarine invertebrates. Cape Hatteras to the Bay of Fundy. New York (NY): Wiley-Interscience; 1971. Google Scholar

Holme NA, McIntyre AD. Methods for the study of marine benthos. Oxford (England): Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1971. (IBP Handbook No. 16) Google Scholar

Lewis PA. References for the identification of freshwater macroinvertebrates; EPA-R4-F2-006. Cincinnati (OH): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1972. Google Scholar

Bousfield EL. Shallow-water gammaridean Amphipoda of New England. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press; 1973. Google Scholar

Day JH. New polychaeta from Beaufort, with a key to all species recorded from North Carolina (US Circular No. 375). Washington (DC): National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service; 1973. Google Scholar

Watling L, Maurer D. Guide to the macroscopic estuarine and marine invertebrates of the Delaware Bay region (Delaware Bay Report Series). Newark (DE): University of Delaware, Newark; 1973, Vol. 5, p. 178. Google Scholar

Williams AB. Marine flora and fauna of the northeastern United States (Crustacean:Decapoda; US Circular No. 389). Washington (DC): National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service; 1974. Google Scholar

Fox RS, Bynum KH. The amphipod crustaceans of North Carolina estuarine waters. Chesapeake Sci. 1975;16:223–237. Google Scholar

Morris PA. A field guide to shells of the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts and the West Indies. Boston (MA): Houghton Mifflin Co.; 1975. Google Scholar

Smith RI, Carlton JT, eds. Light’s manual: intertidal invertebrates of the central California Coast, 3rd ed. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press; 1975. Google Scholar

Blaxter JHS, Russell SFS, Yonge SM. The species of mysids and key to genera. Advan Mar Biol. 1980;18:6–38. Google Scholar

Butler TH. Shrimps of the Pacific Coast of Canada. Can Bull Fish Aquat Sci. 1980;202:1. Google Scholar

Sieg J, Winn RN. The Tanaidae (Crustacea:Tanaidacea) of California, with a key to the world genera. Proc Biol Soc Wash. 1981;94(2):315–343. Google Scholar

Heard RW. Guide to common tidal marsh invertebrates of the northeastern Gulf of Mexico (MASGP-79-004). Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium; 1982. Google Scholar

Price WW. Key to the shallow water Mysidacea of the Texas coast with notes on their ecology. Hydrobiologia. 1982;93(1):9–21. Google Scholar

Wrona FJ, Culp JM, Davies RW. Macroinvertebrate subsampling: a simplified apparatus and approach. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1982;39(7):1051–1054. Google Scholar

Williams AB. Shrimp, lobsters, and crabs of the Atlantic Coast of the eastern United States, Maine to Florida. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press; 1984. Google Scholar

Brinkhurst RO. Guide to the freshwater aquatic microdrile oligochaetes of North America. Ottawa (ON): Department of Fisheries and Oceans; 1986. (Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 84) Google Scholar

Pennak RW. Freshwater invertebrates of the United States—Protozoa to Mollusca. 3rd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1989. Google Scholar

Vecchione M, Roper CFE, Sweeney MJ. Marine flora and fauna of the eastern United States. Mollusca: Cephalopoda. Washington (DC): National Marine Fisheries Service, National Systematics Laboratory; 1989. Google Scholar

Klemm DJ, Lewis PA, Fulk F, Lazorchak JM. Macroinvertebrate field and laboratory methods for evaluating the biological integrity of surface waters, EPA-600/4-90-030. Cincinnati (OH): Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency; 1990. Google Scholar

Packarsky BL, Fraissinet PR, Penton MA, Conklin DJ Jr. Freshwater macroinvertebrates of northeastern North America. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press; 1990. Google Scholar

Klemm DJ. Taxonomy and pollution ecology of the Great Lakes Region leeches (Annelida:Hirudinea). Mich Acad. 1991;24:37–103. Google Scholar

Lovell L, Velarde RG. Regional standardization of taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the Symposium, Biological Criteria: Research and Regulation (EPA 440/5-91/005). Washington (DC): Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency; 1991. Google Scholar

Cuffney TF, Gurtz ME, Meador MR. Guidelines for the processing and quality assurance of benthic invertebrate samples collected as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program (Open-File Report 93-407). Raleigh (NC): US Geological Survey; 1993. Google Scholar

Barbour MT, Gerritsen J. Subsampling of benthic samples: a defense of the fixed-count method. J N Amer Benthol Soc. 1996;15(3):386–391. Google Scholar

Bowman MF, Bailey RC. Does taxonomic resolution affect the multivariate description of the structure of freshwater benthic communities? Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1997;54(8):1802–1807. Google Scholar

Kathman RD, Brikhurst RO. Guide to the freshwater oligochaetes of North America. Thompson Station (TN): Aquatic Resources Center; 1999. Google Scholar

Doberstein CP, Karr JR, Conquest LL. 2000. The effect of fixed-count subsampling on macroinvertebrate biomonitoring in small streams. Freshwater Biol. 1999;44(2):355–371. Google Scholar

Epler JH. Identification manual for the larval Chironomidae (Diptera) of North and South Carolina (Special Publication No. SJ2001-SP13) Palatka (FL): St. Johns River Water Management District; 2001. Google Scholar

Merritt RW, Cummins KW, Berg MB. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. 5th ed. Dubuque (IA): Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company; 2019. Google Scholar

Merritt RW, Cummins KW, Berg MB. An introduction to the freshwater insects of North America. Dubuque (IA): Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company; 2009. Google Scholar

Thorp JH, Covich AP, editors. Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. New York (NY): Academic Press; 2010. Google Scholar

1. Green RH. Sampling design and statistical methods for environmental biologists. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1979. Google Scholar

2. Klemm DJ, Lewis PA, Fulk F, Lazorchak JM. Macroinvertebrate field and laboratory methods for evaluating the biological integrity of surface waters; EPA-600/4-90-030. Cincinnati (OH): Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency; 1990. Google Scholar

3. Washington HG. Diversity, biotic and similarity indices. A review with special relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Water Res. 1984;18(6):653–694. Google Scholar

4. Wilhm JL. Comparison of some diversity indices applied to populations of benthic macroinvertebrates in a stream receiving organic wastes. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1967;39(10):1673–1683. Google Scholar

5. Wilhm JL, Doris TC. Biological parameters for water quality criteria. BioScience 1968;18(6):477–481. Google Scholar

6. Wilhm JL. Range of diversity index in benthic macroinvertebrate populations. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1970;42(5):R221–R224. Google Scholar

7. Wilhm JL. Graphic and mathematical analyses of biotic communities in polluted streams. Annu Rev Entomol. 1972;17:223–252. Google Scholar

8. Cairns J Jr, Albaugh DW, Busey F, Chanay MD. The sequential comparison index—a simplified method for non-biologists to estimate relative differences in biological diversity in stream pollution studies. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1968;40(9):1607–1613. Google Scholar

9. Boesch DF. Application of numerical classification in ecological investigations of water pollution; EPA-600/3-77-033. Corvallis (OR): US Environmental Protection Agency; 1977. (Ecology Progress Series) Google Scholar

10. Smith W, Gibson VR, Brown-Leger LS, Grassle JF. Diversity as an indicator of pollution. Cautionary results from microcosm experiments. In: Grassle JP, Patil GP, Smith W, Taille C, editors. Ecological diversity in theory and practice. Fairland (MD): International Publishing House; 1979. Google Scholar

11. Hoke RA, Giesy JP, Adams JR. Use of linear orthogonal contrasts in analysis of environmental data. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1990;9(6):815–819. Google Scholar

12. Plafkin JL, Barbour MT, Porter KD, Gross SK, Hughes RM. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrates and fish (EPA-440/40-89-001). Washington (DC): Office of Water, Assessment and Watershed Protection Division, US Environmental Protection Agency; 1989. Google Scholar

13. Parkhurst DF. Statistical significance tests: equivalence and reverse tests should reduce misinterpretation. BioScience. 2001;51(12):1051–1057. Google Scholar

14. Chapman PM. Presentation and interpretation of sediment quality triad data. Ecotoxicol. 1996;5:327–339. Google Scholar

Beck WM Jr. Suggested method for reporting biotic data. Sewage Ind Wastes. 1955; 27: 1193–1197. Google Scholar

Ingram WM. Effective methods for collecting and recording data from water pollution surveys. In: Tarzwell CM, compiler. Biological problems in water pollution. Cincinnati (OH): US Department of Health, Education and Welfare; 1960, p. 260. Google Scholar

Ingram WM, Bartsch AF. Graphic expression of biological data in water pollution reports. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1960; 32(3):297–310. Google Scholar

Pielou EC. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J Theor Biol. 1966; 13:131–144. Google Scholar

Cairns J Jr, Dickson KL. A simple method for the biological assessment of the effects of waste discharges on aquatic bottom-dwelling organisms. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1971; 43(5):755–772. Google Scholar

Erman DC, Helm WT. Comparison of some species importance values and ordination techniques used to analyse benthic invertebrate communities. Oikos. 1971;22(2):240–247. Google Scholar

Orloci L, Rao CR, Stiteler WM, editors. Multivariate methods in ecological work. Fairland (MD): International Cooperative Publishing House; 1978. Google Scholar

Conover WJ. Practical nonparametric statistics. 2nd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1980. Google Scholar

Pollard JE. Investigator differences associated with a kicking method for sampling macroinvertebrates. J Freshwater Ecol. 1981; 1(2):215–224. Google Scholar

Gauch HG Jr. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 1982. Google Scholar

Platts WS, Megahan WF, Minshall GW. Methods for evaluating stream, riparian, and biotic conditions (General Technical Report INT-138). Ogden (UT): US Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service; 1983. Google Scholar

Allan JD. Hypothesis testing in ecological studies of aquatic insects. In: Resh VH, Rosenberg DM, editors. The ecology of aquatic insects. New York (NY): Praeger Scientific; 1984, p. 484. Google Scholar

Fausch DD, Karr JR, Yant PR. Regional application of an index of biotic integrity based on stream fish communities. Trans Amer Fish Soc. 1984;113:39–55. Google Scholar

Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1984. Google Scholar

Dawson CL, Hellenthal RA. A computerized system for the evaluation of aquatic habitats based on environmental requirements and pollution tolerance association of resident organisms; EPA-600/53-85-019. Cincinnati (OH): US Environmental Protection Agency; 1986. Google Scholar

Hughes RM, Larsen DP, Omernik JM. Regional reference sites: a method for assessing stream potentials. Environ Management 1986; 10:629–635. Google Scholar

Karr JR, Fausch KD, Angermeier PL, Yant PR, Schlosser IJ. Assessing biological integrity in running waters: a method and its rationale. Champaign (IL): Illinois Natural History Survey; 1986. (Special Publication No. 5) Google Scholar

Leonard PM, Orth DJ. Application and testing of an index of biotic integrity in small, coolwater streams. Trans Amer Fish Soc. 1986; 115:401–414. Google Scholar

Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF. Statistical ecology. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1988. Google Scholar

Steedman RJ. Modification and assessment of an index of biotic integrity to quantify stream quality in southern Ontario. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1988; 45(3):492–501. Google Scholar

Plante C, Downing JA. Production of freshwater invertebrate populations in lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1989; 46(9):1489–1498. Google Scholar

Plante C, Downing JA. Empirical evidence for differences among methods for calculating secondary production. J N Amer Benthol Soc. 1990; 9(1):9–16. Google Scholar

Wetzel RG, Likens GE. Limnological analyses. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 1991. Google Scholar

Barbour MT, Graves CG, Plafkin JL, Wisseman RW, Bradley BP. Evaluation of EPA’s rapid bioassessment benthic metrics: metric redundancy and variability among reference stream sites. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1992; 11(4):437–449. Google Scholar

Lenat DR. A biotic index for the southeastern United States: derivation and list of tolerance values, with criteria for assigning water-quality ratings. J N Amer Benthol Soc. 1993;12(3):279–290. Google Scholar

Norris RH, Georges A. Analysis and interpretation of benthic macroinvertebrate surveys. In: Rosenberg DM and Resh VH, eds. Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. New York (NY): Chapman & Hall; 1993, p. 234. Google Scholar

Resh VH, McElravy EP. Contemporary quantitative approaches to biomonitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg DM, Resh VH, eds. Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. New York (NY): Chapman & Hall; 1993, p. 159. Google Scholar

Resh VH, Jackson JK. Rapid assessment approaches to biomonitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg DM, Resh VH, eds. Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. New York (NY): Chapman & Hall; 1993, p. 195. Google Scholar

Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. New York (NY): Chapman & Hall; 1993. Google Scholar

Fore LS, Karr JR, Conquest LL. Statistical properties of an index of biological integrity used to evaluate water resources. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1994; 51(5):1077–1087. Google Scholar

Barbour MT, Stribling J, Karr JR. The multimetric approach for establishing biocriteria and measuring biological conditions. In: David WS, Simon T, eds. Biological assessment and criteria, tools for water resource planning and decision making. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis Publishers; 1995, Chapter 6, p. 63. Google Scholar

Bode RW, Novak MA. Development and application of biological impairment criteria for rivers and streams in New York state. In: David WS, Simon TP, eds. Biological assessment and criteria, tools for water resource planning and decision making. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis Publishers; 1995, Chapter 8, p. 97. Google Scholar

DeShon JE. Development and application of the invertebrate community index (ICI). In: Davis WS, Simon TP, eds. Biological assessment and criteria, tools for water resource planning and decision making. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis Publishers; 1995, Chapter 15, p. 217. Google Scholar

Gerritsen J. Additive biological indices for resource management. J N Amer Benthol Soc. 1995; 14(3):451–457. Google Scholar

Jongman RHG, Ter Braak CJF, Van Toingeren OFR, eds. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 1995. Google Scholar

Norris RH. Biological monitoring: the dilemma of data analysis. J N Amer Benthol Soc. 1995;14(3):440–450. Google Scholar

Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Griffith GE, Frydenborg R, McCarron E, White JS, Bastían ML. A framework for biological criteria for Florida streams using benthic macroinvertebrates. J N Amer Benthol Soc. 1996;15(2):185–211. Google Scholar

Fore LS, Karr JR, Wisseman RW. Assessing invertebrate responses to human activities: evaluating alternative approaches. J N Amer Benthol Soc. 1996;15(2):212–231. Google Scholar

Wallace JB, Grubaugh JW, Whiles MR. Biotic indices and stream ecosystem processes: results from an experimental study. Ecol Appl. 1996;6(1):140–151. Google Scholar

Bowman MF, Bailey RC. Does taxonomic resolution affect the multivariate description of the structure of freshwater benthic communities? Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1997;54(8):1802–1807. Google Scholar

Karr JR, Chu EW. Biological monitoring and assessment: using multimetric indexes effectively (EPA 235-R07-001). Seattle (WA): University of Washington; 1997. Google Scholar

Meyer JL. Stream health: incorporating the human dimension to advance stream ecology. J N Amer Benthol Soc 1997;16(2):439–447. Google Scholar

Hewlett R. Implications of taxonomic resolution and sample habitat for stream classification at a broad geographic scale. J N Amer Benthol Soc. 2000;19(2):352–361. Google Scholar

Maxted JR, Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Poretti V, Primrose N, Silvia A, Penrose D, Renfrow R. Assessment framework for mid-Atlantic coastal plain streams using benthic macroinvertebrates. J N Amer Benthol Soc. 2000;19(1):128–144. Google Scholar