The content presented here represents the most current version of this section, which was printed in the 24th edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.

10600 FISH

CopyRight

10600 A. Introduction References
1. Huggett RJ, Kimerue RA, Mehrle PM Jr, Bergman HL. Biomarkers, biochemical, physiological, and histological markers of anthropogenic stress. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis Publisher; 1992. Google Scholar
2. Waters WE, Erman DC. Research methods: concept and design. In: Schreck CB, Moyle PB, eds. Methods for fish biology, pp. 1., Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; 1990. Google Scholar
3. Schreck CB, Moyle PB, eds. Methods for fish biology. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; 1990. Google Scholar
4. Royce WF. Introduction to the practice of fishery science. Orlando (FL): Academic Press; 1984. Google Scholar
5. Templeton RG. Freshwater fisheries management. Farnham, Surrey (England): Fishing News Books Ltd.; 1984. Google Scholar
6. Nielsen L, Johnson DL, eds. Fisheries techniques. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; 1983. Google Scholar
7. Everhart WH, Youngs WD. Principles of fishery science. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press; 1981. Google Scholar
8. Bagenal T, ed. Methods for the assessment of fish production in fresh waters, 3rd ed.; IBP Handbook No. 3. Oxford (England): Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1978. Google Scholar
9. McCormick FH, Hughes RM. Section 12. Aquatic vertebrates. In: Lazorchak IM, Klemm DJ, Peck DV, eds. Environmental monitoring and assessment program—surface waters: field operations and methods for measuring the ecological conditions of wadeable streams; EPA-620-R-94-004F, p. 159. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1998. Google Scholar
10600 B. Data Acquisition References
1. Berry CR Jr. Safety in fisheries work. In: Murphy BR, Willis DW, eds. Fisheries techniques, 2nd ed., pp. 63. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; 1996. Google Scholar
2. Baltz DM. Autecology. In: Schreck CB, Moyle PB, eds. Methods for fish biology, p. 585. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; 1990. Google Scholar
3. Kneib RT. The role of tidal marshes in the ecology of estuarine ­nekton. Ocean Mar Biol Annu Rev. 1997;35:163–220. Google Scholar
4. Rozas LP, Minello TJ. Estimating densities of small fishes and decapod crustaceans in shallow estuarine habitats: a review of sampling design with focus on gear selection. Estuaries. 1997;20(1):199–213. Google Scholar
5. McClane AJ, ed. McClane’s new standard fishing encyclopedia and international angling guide. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1974. Google Scholar
6. Yozzo DJ, Smith DE. Composition and abundance of resident marsh-surface nekton: comparisons between tidal freshwater and salt marshes in Virginia, USA. Hydrobiologia. 1998;362:9–19. Google Scholar
7. Breder CM Jr. Design of a fry trap. Zoologica. 1960;45:155–164. Google Scholar
8. Fulling GL, Peterson MS, Crego GJ. Comparison of Breder traps and seines used to sample marsh nekton. Estuaries. 1999;22(2A):224–230. Google Scholar
9. Snyder DE. Terminology for intervals of larval fish development. In: Boreman J, ed. Great lakes fish egg and larvae identification: Proceedings of a Workshop, p. 41. Ann Arbor (MI): U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Powerplant Team; 1976. Google Scholar
10. Bowles RR, Merriner JV. Evaluation of ichthyoplankton sampling gear used in power plant studies. In: Jensen LD, ed. Proceedings of 4th Annual Workshop on Entrainment and Impingement, Chicago (IL); 1978. Google Scholar
11. Smith PE, Richardson SL, eds. Standard techniques for pelagic fish egg and larva surveys; FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 175. Rome (Italy): Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1977. Google Scholar
12. Tranter DJ, ed. Zooplankton sampling, UNESCO Monograph Oceanography Methodology No. 2. Paris (France): United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization; 1968. Google Scholar
13. Choat JH, Doherty PJ, Kerrigan BA, Leis JM. Sampling of larvae and pelagic juveniles of coral reef fishes: a comparison of towed nets, purse seine and light aggregation devices. Fish Bull. 1993;91(2):195–209. Google Scholar
14. Wiebe PH, Burt KH, Boyd SH, Morton AW. A multiple opening/closing net and environmental sensing system for sampling zooplankton. J Mar Res. 1976;34(3):313–326. Google Scholar
15. Brander K, Thompson AB. Diel differences in avoidance of three vertical profile sampling gears by herring larvae. J Plankton Res. 1989;11(4):775–784. Google Scholar
16. McIvor CC, Odum WE. The flume net: a quantitative method for sampling fishes and macrocrustaceans on tidal marsh surfaces. Estuaries. 1986;9(3):219–224. Google Scholar
17. Novotny D, Priegel GR. Electrofishing boats, improved designs and operational guidelines to increase the effectiveness of boom shockers; Technical Bulletin No. 73. Madison (WI): Department of Natural Resources; 1974. Google Scholar
18. Vibert, R, ed. Fishing with electricity, its application to biology and management, contributions to a symposium. London (UK): European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission, FAO, Fishing News Books Ltd.; 1967. Google Scholar
19. Webster DA, Forney JL, Gibbs RH Jr, Severs JH, Van Woert WF. A comparison of alternating and direct currents in fishery work. NY Fish Game J. 1955;2(1):106–116. Google Scholar
20. Schnick RA, Meyer FP, Gray DL. A guide to approved chemicals in fish production and fishery resource management. La Crosse (WI): National Fish Research Laboratory; 1986. Google Scholar
21. Mitson RB. Fisheries sonar. Farnham, Surrey (England): Fishing News Books Ltd.; 1983. Google Scholar
22. Maes J, Pas J, Taillieu A, Van Damme PA, Ollevier F. Sampling of fish and crustaceans at the cooling water intake of an estuarine power plant: a comparison with stow net fishery. Arch Fish Mar Res. 2001;49(1):27–36. Google Scholar
23. Attrill MJ, Power M. Climatic influence on a marine fish assemblage. Nature. 2002;417(6886):275–278. Google Scholar
24. Henderson PA. On the structure of the inshore fish community of England and Wales. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 1989;69(1):145–163. Google Scholar
25. Prentice EF, Sims CW, Park DL. A study to determine the biological feasibility of a new fish tagging system. Portland (OR): Division of Fish and Wildlife, Bonneville Power Administration; 1985. Google Scholar
10600 B. Data Acquisition Bibliography
10600 D. Analysis of Collections References
1. Nelson JS, Crossman EJ, Espinosa-Perez H, Findley LT, Gilbert CR, Lea RN, Williams JD, eds. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. 6th ed.; Special Publication No. 29. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; 2004. Google Scholar
2. Cushing DH. Marine ecology and fisheries. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 1975. Google Scholar
3. Bagenal TB, ed. Aging of fish. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium at University of Reading, England, 1973 July 19–20. Surrey (England): The Gresham Press; 1974. Google Scholar
4. Stevenson DK, Campana SE, eds. Otolith microstructure examination and analysis. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 117, Ottawa (ON); 1992. Google Scholar
5. Pielou EC. Ecological diversity. New York (NY): Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons; 1975. Google Scholar
6. Karr JR, Fausch KD, Angermeier PL, Yant PR, Schlosser IJ. Assessing biological integrity in running waters: a method and its rationale; Special Publication No. 5. Champaign (IL): Illinois Natural History Survey; 1986. Google Scholar
7. Miller DL, Angermeier PL, Hughes RM, Karr JR, Moyle PB, Schrader LH, Thompson BA, Daniels RA, Fausch KD, Fitzhugh GA, Gammon JR, Halliwell DB, Leonard PM, Orth DJ. Regional applications of an index of biotic integrity for use in water resource management. Fisheries. 1988;13(5):12–20. Google Scholar
10600 D. Analysis of Collections Bibliography
10600 E. Investigation of Fish Kills References
1. Burdick GE. Some problems in the determination of the cause of fish kills. In: Biological problems in water pollution; Publication No. 999-WP-25. Washington (DC): U.S. Public Health Service; 1965. Google Scholar
2. Meyer FP, Barclay LA. Field manual for the investigation of fish kills; Resource Publication No. 177. Washington (DC): U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 1990. Google Scholar
3. Strange RJ. Field examination of fishes. In: Murphy BR, Willis DW, eds. Fisheries techniques. 2nd ed., p. 433. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; 1996. Google Scholar
10600 E. Investigation of Fish Kills Bibliography
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration. Investigating fish mortalities; Publication No. CWT-5. Washington DC: U.S. Department of the Interior (also available as No. 0-380-257; Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office); 1970. Google Scholar
Grizzle JM, Rogers WA. Anatomy and histology of the channel catfish. Auburn (AL): Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University; 1976. Google Scholar
Gorman DB. Histology of the striped bass; AFS Monograph No. 3. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; 1982. Google Scholar
Roberts RJ, ed. Microbial diseases of fish. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1982. Google Scholar
Yasutake WT, Wales JH. Microscopic anatomy of salmonids: an atlas; Resource Publication No. 150. Washington DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior; 1983. Google Scholar
Cairns VW, Hodson PV, Nriagu JO, eds. Contaminant effects on fisheries. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1984. Google Scholar
Ellis AE. Fish and shellfish pathology. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1985. Google Scholar
Stoskopf NK. Fish medicine. Philadelphia (PA): W.B. Saunders Co.; 1993. Google Scholar

Related

No related items

TAGGED IN:

  • Biological

TOOLS

CITATION

Standard Methods Committee of the American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation. 10600 fish In: Standard Methods For the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Lipps WC, Baxter TE, Braun-Howland E, editors. Washington DC: APHA Press.

DOI: 10.2105/SMWW.2882.211

SHARE

FROM THE DISCUSSION FORUM: